Chi Bao Le. Back for more blogging. Are you ready?
I had a male student who first tried to give himself the name Honey. He changed it to Malone because he said it was easier to remember.
From this blog about the 2008 presidential campaign, I came up with this choicest chunk of gobbley gook:
The Democratic nomination battle has rapidly evolved into a debate about change, but in Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards, Democratic voters have distinctly different styles to choose from. The question is, who best fits what the country wants.
Clinton offers a clear break from the policies of the Bush administration and the assurance that she has the kind of experience to get things done. Obama promises transformational change and a break from the old politics. Edwards projects big, bold changes -- and an aggressive attack on Washington's culture of money and politics.
Clearly, this was written by a leftie or a Democrat partisan. It is absolutely meaningless. What is the difference between a clear break, a transformational change or a big, bold change? It is the sort of language that gives politicians a bad name. My cousin Pat is right. This election theme's song should be send in the clowns.
As well, Seablogger ends a posting about about 2008 with the call of farce.
No comments:
Post a Comment